<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Montecristo No.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/</link>
	<description>A Vancouver-based blog about scotch, cigars, and more. Weekly cigar and scotch reviews, as well as other great articles.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeo y Julieta No. 3 (Tubo) &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</title>
		<link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeo y Julieta No. 3 (Tubo) &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/?p=178#comment-437</guid>
		<description>[...] chance.  I think there are other Cubans in this price range offering better value, for example the Montecristo No. 4.  In summary, The RyJ No. 3 Tubo is not a huge investment, but you’re probably better off [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chance.  I think there are other Cubans in this price range offering better value, for example the Montecristo No. 4.  In summary, The RyJ No. 3 Tubo is not a huge investment, but you’re probably better off [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/?p=178#comment-212</guid>
		<description>The Monte #4 is pretty much my go-to smoke. Perfect size and is usually great. You mentioned that they were tightly packed and had a tough draw. I find that #4&#039;s are rather inconsistent. In one box of 25, I found that each one could be very different from the rest. They are all good, but some are better than others. This is my go-to smoke moreso because of the smaller size, but if I&#039;m really out to enjoy a long smoke, the Monte #2 is my absolute favourite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Monte #4 is pretty much my go-to smoke. Perfect size and is usually great. You mentioned that they were tightly packed and had a tough draw. I find that #4&#8242;s are rather inconsistent. In one box of 25, I found that each one could be very different from the rest. They are all good, but some are better than others. This is my go-to smoke moreso because of the smaller size, but if I&#8217;m really out to enjoy a long smoke, the Monte #2 is my absolute favourite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scotch Reviews - Highland Park 18 Year &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</title>
		<link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Scotch Reviews - Highland Park 18 Year &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/?p=178#comment-151</guid>
		<description>[...] The 18 year is remarkably fresh on the nose, with a nice balanced honey aroma.  While many have labeled this whisky as &#8220;pale gold&#8221; or &#8220;natural,&#8221; it was much more of a dark amber in our glasses.  There is a pleasant ginger oakiness on the palate, with a minerally waxy mouth feel.  The whisky has no overpowering characterestics, with nothing sticking out &#8211; no highs or lows.  This would pair well with an equally balanced cigar such as a Monte Cristo No. 4. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 18 year is remarkably fresh on the nose, with a nice balanced honey aroma.  While many have labeled this whisky as &#8220;pale gold&#8221; or &#8220;natural,&#8221; it was much more of a dark amber in our glasses.  There is a pleasant ginger oakiness on the palate, with a minerally waxy mouth feel.  The whisky has no overpowering characterestics, with nothing sticking out &#8211; no highs or lows.  This would pair well with an equally balanced cigar such as a Monte Cristo No. 4. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Inspector</title>
		<link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Inspector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/?p=178#comment-9</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a very nice review - a Monte No. 4 is a good first smoke.
Thanks for the link love as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very nice review &#8211; a Monte No. 4 is a good first smoke.<br />
Thanks for the link love as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
