<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Montecristo No.4</title> <atom:link href="http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/</link> <description>A Vancouver-based blog about scotch, cigars, and more. Weekly cigar and scotch reviews, as well as other great articles.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 04:43:05 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Romeo y Julieta No. 3 (Tubo) &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</title><link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link> <dc:creator>Romeo y Julieta No. 3 (Tubo) &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:04:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/?p=178#comment-437</guid> <description>[...] chance.  I think there are other Cubans in this price range offering better value, for example the Montecristo No. 4.  In summary, The RyJ No. 3 Tubo is not a huge investment, but you’re probably better off [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chance.  I think there are other Cubans in this price range offering better value, for example the Montecristo No. 4.  In summary, The RyJ No. 3 Tubo is not a huge investment, but you’re probably better off [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tim</title><link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link> <dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:26:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/?p=178#comment-212</guid> <description>The Monte #4 is pretty much my go-to smoke. Perfect size and is usually great. You mentioned that they were tightly packed and had a tough draw. I find that #4&#039;s are rather inconsistent. In one box of 25, I found that each one could be very different from the rest. They are all good, but some are better than others. This is my go-to smoke moreso because of the smaller size, but if I&#039;m really out to enjoy a long smoke, the Monte #2 is my absolute favourite.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Monte #4 is pretty much my go-to smoke. Perfect size and is usually great. You mentioned that they were tightly packed and had a tough draw. I find that #4&#8242;s are rather inconsistent. In one box of 25, I found that each one could be very different from the rest. They are all good, but some are better than others. This is my go-to smoke moreso because of the smaller size, but if I&#8217;m really out to enjoy a long smoke, the Monte #2 is my absolute favourite.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Scotch Reviews - Highland Park 18 Year &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</title><link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link> <dc:creator>Scotch Reviews - Highland Park 18 Year &#124; The Aspiring Gentleman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:05:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/?p=178#comment-151</guid> <description>[...] The 18 year is remarkably fresh on the nose, with a nice balanced honey aroma.  While many have labeled this whisky as &#8220;pale gold&#8221; or &#8220;natural,&#8221; it was much more of a dark amber in our glasses.  There is a pleasant ginger oakiness on the palate, with a minerally waxy mouth feel.  The whisky has no overpowering characterestics, with nothing sticking out &#8211; no highs or lows.  This would pair well with an equally balanced cigar such as a Monte Cristo No. 4. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 18 year is remarkably fresh on the nose, with a nice balanced honey aroma.  While many have labeled this whisky as &#8220;pale gold&#8221; or &#8220;natural,&#8221; it was much more of a dark amber in our glasses.  There is a pleasant ginger oakiness on the palate, with a minerally waxy mouth feel.  The whisky has no overpowering characterestics, with nothing sticking out &#8211; no highs or lows.  This would pair well with an equally balanced cigar such as a Monte Cristo No. 4. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cigar Inspector</title><link>http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/cigars/cigar-reviews/montecristo-no4/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link> <dc:creator>Cigar Inspector</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:28:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.aspiringgentleman.com/?p=178#comment-9</guid> <description>That&#039;s a very nice review - a Monte No. 4 is a good first smoke.
Thanks for the link love as well!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a very nice review &#8211; a Monte No. 4 is a good first smoke.<br
/> Thanks for the link love as well!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
